Put the kettle on Luv

Solar energy, wind turbines whatever it is then here is your place to talk about it.
Post Reply
User avatar
mamos
Living the good life
Living the good life
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:17 am
Location: FCUK Falmouth Cornwall United Kindom
Contact:

Put the kettle on Luv

Post: # 133591Post mamos »

Hi All

A quick question for all you Scientists or Mathematicians out there.

When we boil a kettle for coffee or washing up (we don't have any other method of heating water) we always fill up a flask with any surplus so if we want a coffee later on we don't have to boil the kettle again.

Now, is it better to boil more water than you need and put it in the flask or is it better to boil a kettle with just the right amount of water everytime we want a cuppa

mamos
If you are interested in Self Reliance, Frugal Living, Gardening and becoming Debt Free, follow my Blog Tiny Allotment

User avatar
Annpan
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5464
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:43 pm
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland

Re: Put the kettle on Luv

Post: # 133604Post Annpan »

Don't you find that you alway boil a little too much anyway?

I also store hot water in a flask, though mostly for using for cleaning (we don't have hot running water either) I occasionally use it for hot drinks.

I had always thought it was better to boil twice the amount, that boil the kettle twice - though I base this presumption on nothing in particular.
Ann Pan

"Some days you're the dog,
some days you're the lamp-post"

My blog
My Tea Cosy Shop
Some photos
My eBay

User avatar
red
A selfsufficientish Regular
A selfsufficientish Regular
Posts: 6513
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:59 pm
Location: Devon UK
Contact:

Re: Put the kettle on Luv

Post: # 133614Post red »

I'm not a scientist.. but I think - it must take so much energy to warm up the body of the kettle, and so happens whether you boil 1 pint or 2. so in theory, it should take less than twice the energy to boil twice the volume. but.. you have to balance this against how fast the water cools in the flask, whether you actually need water at boiling point for washing etc.

but why not try just measuring the units used both ways? I would.. but we use a kettle on the rayburn...
Red

I like like minded people... a bit like minded anyway.. well people with bits of their minds that are like the bits of my mind that I like...

my website: colour it green

etsy shop

blog

User avatar
mamos
Living the good life
Living the good life
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:17 am
Location: FCUK Falmouth Cornwall United Kindom
Contact:

Re: Put the kettle on Luv

Post: # 134836Post mamos »

I will try it out and let you know

mamos
If you are interested in Self Reliance, Frugal Living, Gardening and becoming Debt Free, follow my Blog Tiny Allotment

User avatar
Odsox
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5466
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 2:21 pm
Location: West Cork, Ireland

Re: Put the kettle on Luv

Post: # 134853Post Odsox »

red wrote:I'm not a scientist.. but I think - it must take so much energy to warm up the body of the kettle, and so happens whether you boil 1 pint or 2. so in theory, it should take less than twice the energy to boil twice the volume. but.. you have to balance this against how fast the water cools in the flask, whether you actually need water at boiling point for washing etc.

but why not try just measuring the units used both ways? I would.. but we use a kettle on the rayburn...
Yes, I think you are right Red.
If I remember rightly a BTU (British Thermal Unit) is the amount of energy needed to raise 1 pound of water through 1 degree Fahrenheit
Also I seem to remember a Calorie is energy needed to raise 1 gram of water through 1 degree Centigrade.
I also think both units are pretty well obsolete now ... but then so am I :lol:
Tony

Disclaimer: I almost certainly haven't a clue what I'm talking about.

Post Reply