
and for the record, this is me playing nicely.

SusieGee wrote:Well then, play nicer!demi wrote:well thats me told then![]()
and for the record, this is me playing nicely.
I was going to respond quite extensively to this, including referencing serious philosophers and theologians, but I don't think I'm going to bother now...boboff wrote:Yes indeed, the basic premice of "faith" we can leave to one side, as like you say it's both personal, and also just as impossible to disprove as prove, if you are of the mind to.
And it wouldn't matter in the least if they were, or not. Keep the good stuff because it's good, not because it's old, or written in some holy book. If you think you need a holy book to tell you what's good, Socrates would like a word with you... And when people come up with new good stuff (such as "Actually, gay people aren't a threat or a problem, let's treat them just like everybody else") then consider it solely on its own merits.boboff wrote:You are right in that to put this as a fundamental aspect of religion and ignore the "dogma" is cherry picking in the extreme, but thats not to say that these rules perhaps were part of society before our current version of religion.
gregorach wrote:boboff wrote:
Once you really strip all the dogma out of religion, what you're left with is indistinguishable from secular humanism.
oldjerry wrote:gregorach wrote:boboff wrote:
Once you really strip all the dogma out of religion, what you're left with is indistinguishable from secular humanism.
I agree with all you've said Dunc,it's just thatfor some of us,the recent fashion for aggressive atheism is becoming indistinguishable from mainstream Evangelical Christian practice.
"Aggressive" atheism, eh? You getting atheists banging on your door on a Sunday morning or something? I think you might mean "atheists who don't shut up and go away just because someone says they should"... We have as much right to participate openly in civic life, to state our beliefs and to expect them to be respected, as anybody else. Let me know when you've got some atheist in a funny hat telling you that you can't get married because he doesn't like your choice of partner, and that in fact to allow it would cause the end of civilisation as we know it, and I'll take your complaint a little more seriously.oldjerry wrote:gregorach wrote:boboff wrote:
Once you really strip all the dogma out of religion, what you're left with is indistinguishable from secular humanism.
I agree with all you've said Dunc,it's just thatfor some of us,the recent fashion for aggressive atheism is becoming indistinguishable from mainstream Evangelical Christian practice.
That's fair enough, but a lot of people seem to feel that our very existence is an affront to them. I'm certainly not proselytising, but I'm not going to hide either.sleepyowl wrote:I think prostletising what ever your faith is is bad for the soul & yes I mean metaphorically speaking, I would hang my head in shame if I saw Pagan do that or an Atheist come to think of it, as the old saying goes a good pub needs no advertising.
It was kind of inevitable, given that the only objections to gay marriage are religious. It is a religious argument, and there's no getting away from it.sleepyowl wrote:Anyway this post was about having your say in English & Welsh politics not arguing over religion
OK, all opposition that actually gets any traction... I mean, I think I've followed the matter pretty closely and I've yet to see either of those points even obliquely alluded to in any media coverage.sleepyowl wrote:You'd be surprised, not all opposition to gay marriage is religious, some gay people are 'why should we conform to what heterosexuals do?' Plus there is the whole thing of you can have open relationship in a civil partnership & it isn't considered adultery.
http://boboffs.blogspot.co.uk/Millymollymandy wrote:Bloody smilies, always being used. I hate them and they should be banned.
No I won't use a smiley because I've decided to turn into Boboff, as he's turned all nice all of a sudden. Grumble grumble.
Actually, the photo's a bit out of date... My beard is now trimmed short and kept neat, and my hair barely makes it past my collar these days.boboff wrote:It's a shame Dunc's not more religous, he could pass for a later day masia with that beard and long hair!
That's a pretty good definition of humanism really. Some other definitions here: http://www.humanism.org.uk/humanismboboff wrote:My life is about family and friends, health, happiness and well being
That's generally because those things aren't generally considered 'news worthy opinions' as it is not an organised group, but I have come across it. Perhaps you need to hang out in gay bars more if the cheesy shite music that they generally play doesn't drive you completely insane & make you want to gouge your ears out with a rusty teaspoongregorach wrote:OK, all opposition that actually gets any traction... I mean, I think I've followed the matter pretty closely and I've yet to see either of those points even obliquely alluded to in any media coverage.