organic horses can cause examination failure
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:11 am
In 2001 I passed the fairly prestigious British Equestrian Tourism Center Manager Examination. This is run by the British Horse Society.
I ALMOST didn't pass, and was told that the examiners were concerned about my attitude to horse worming.
I stated that I thought routine worming as advocated in most horsey mags and advice columns including that of BHS is bad for horses, bad for the environment and promoted by the companies (you know the ones) that sell these.
I further stated that I normally work in Europe setting up Equestrian Tourism concerns in areas of great environmental importance where you can`t just pour drugs onto the land via livestock. I quoted the example of the problems caused by the ill advised worming of elephants at various national parks in Africa. I also mentioned that to keep animals organically you may use medicines if they are needed because of ill health in the animal, but are not allowed to use medicines prophilactically.
In order to qualify to take the above examination you need to have a high level of knowledge and experience.
But it seems that the BHS (which is the only body that gives such qualifications) feels qualiofied to decide what conclusions said expertise may draw from said experience.
IE, you can have any opinion as long as it is the same as ours.
And this is pernicious in that it forces most people into a highly chemically enriched horse keeping experience, which no one says is necessary, or useful, except those who sell us the drugs.
The professional Association to which one is obliged to belong if one is to proceed in the field of horseyness is out of order in this I believe.
If you are horsey please check the alternative ways t o keep your horse healthy.
Penny
I ALMOST didn't pass, and was told that the examiners were concerned about my attitude to horse worming.
I stated that I thought routine worming as advocated in most horsey mags and advice columns including that of BHS is bad for horses, bad for the environment and promoted by the companies (you know the ones) that sell these.
I further stated that I normally work in Europe setting up Equestrian Tourism concerns in areas of great environmental importance where you can`t just pour drugs onto the land via livestock. I quoted the example of the problems caused by the ill advised worming of elephants at various national parks in Africa. I also mentioned that to keep animals organically you may use medicines if they are needed because of ill health in the animal, but are not allowed to use medicines prophilactically.
In order to qualify to take the above examination you need to have a high level of knowledge and experience.
But it seems that the BHS (which is the only body that gives such qualifications) feels qualiofied to decide what conclusions said expertise may draw from said experience.
IE, you can have any opinion as long as it is the same as ours.
And this is pernicious in that it forces most people into a highly chemically enriched horse keeping experience, which no one says is necessary, or useful, except those who sell us the drugs.
The professional Association to which one is obliged to belong if one is to proceed in the field of horseyness is out of order in this I believe.
If you are horsey please check the alternative ways t o keep your horse healthy.
Penny