Here you go, Bonnie - this is a good example of legal-eagle crap and the reason I have decided all over again to have a down on lawyers. OH was feeling a bit uneasy about not approaching a solicitor (exactly the thing they want her to feel). So she contacted her solicitor about the deal.
She was told ...
It would cost her £575 (not including surveyor's fees). Now, any solicitor may certainly charge what they see fit but that seems a little OTT. But then to be told that it would cost the neighbour the same amount for the same deal ... well, I smelled a rat.
According to this "solicitor" (and as it is a mere conveyancing matter, OH was no doubt speaking to a solicitor's clerk, but she wasn't told that) we MUST go through a solicitor, and our neighbour MUST do the same thing. Neither of these things is true but, according to the font of knowledge, we simply could not finalise the deal WITHOUT the services of two solicitors (she also informed OH that she could not act for both parties - that's an out and out lie in the case of a simple land transfer).
When OH began to ask a few questions, she wasn't given a single direct answer, but was told in no uncertain terms that unless she basically did as she was told and took this (bad) advice, we would not be able to transfer the land.
From start to finish, the advice she was given is absolute bulls**t. I feel sure that any licensed conveyancer who happens not to be a solicitor would agree with my grievance. I'm so annoyed that I've a good mind to report the firm to the Law Society - surely that august body would take a dim view of any solicitor lying to a client?
Sorry to rant, and I'm certainly not getting at you, Bonnie. Things would be easier if you opened an office in Retford
Mike